1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2005 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2005 Subaru Baja is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 475 kg more than 2005 Subaru Baja.
Because 2005 Subaru Baja is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Baja will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2005 Subaru Baja | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Subaru |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Baja |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2112 kg | 1637 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 64 L |
