1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2008 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2008 Saturn Outlook is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 377 kg more than 2008 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2008 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2008 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Saturn |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2112 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 83 L |
