1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 364 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Cadillac |
Model | Silver Cloud | CTS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2112 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |