1960 Saab 93 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Saab 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Saab 93 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1960 Saab 93. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1960 Saab 93.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Saab 93. (68 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Saab 93. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1960 Saab 93 has manual transmission. 1960 Saab 93 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Saab 93 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Saab | SsangYong |
| Model | 93 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 748 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
