1960 Seat 1400 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1960 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 115 kg more than 1960 Seat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 1400. (88 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Seat 1400 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1400 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1394 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |
