1960 Seat 1400 vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 1400 would be higher.
Because 1960 Seat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Seat 1400 | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Seat | Nissan |
Model | 1400 | Leaf |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |