1960 Seat 600 vs. 2004 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2004 Smart ForFour is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForFour weights approximately 400 kg more than 1960 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Seat 600 | 2004 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Seat | Smart |
Model | 600 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2510 mm |