1960 Seat 600 vs. 2004 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Musso is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600.
Because 2004 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Seat 600 | 2004 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Seat | SsangYong |
| Model | 600 | Musso |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
