1960 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Seat 600 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Seat | Nissan |
| Model | 600 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
