1960 Simca Plein Ceil vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1964 Toyota Corona is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Corona (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil weights approximately 130 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Simca Plein Ceil | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Simca | Toyota |
| Model | Plein Ceil | Corona |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 61 L |
