1960 Steyr 500 vs. 2003 Suzuki Swift

To start off, 2003 Suzuki Swift is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Steyr 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Steyr 500 would be higher. At 993 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Suzuki Swift (52 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1960 Steyr 500. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1960 Steyr 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 254 kg more than 1960 Steyr 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Steyr 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Steyr 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Suzuki Swift (76 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Steyr 500. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Steyr 500.

Compare all specifications: