1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Studebaker | Triumph |
Model | Sky Hawk | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1960 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |