1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2001 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2001 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Studebaker | Ford |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2779 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3066 mm |
