1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Studebaker | Toyota |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2779 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |
