1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (209 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 208 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (396 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (171 Nm). This means 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk 2005 Suzuki Reno
Make Studebaker Suzuki
Model Sky Hawk Reno
Year Released 1960 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4735 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 209 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 396 Nm 171 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1242 kg
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2980 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]