1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2006 Honda Integra
To start off, 2006 Honda Integra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. (209 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2006 Honda Integra | |
Make | Studebaker | Honda |
Model | Sky Hawk | Integra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4735 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |