1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 252 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Studebaker | Honda |
Model | Sky Hawk | Jazz |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 77 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 42 L |