1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2011 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (209 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2011 Saab 05-Sep. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 05-Sep.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2011 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Studebaker | Saab |
Model | Sky Hawk | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4735 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |