1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 478 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Studebaker | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2779 cc | 2231 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 181 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
