1960 Suzuki Light vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1960 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1216 kg more than 1960 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Suzuki Light | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
| Model | Light | CTS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
