1960 Toyota Crown vs. 2004 Honda Integra
To start off, 2004 Honda Integra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Crown. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Crown.
Because 1960 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Crown | 2004 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Crown | Integra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4374 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1725 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
