1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1990 Holden Barina
To start off, 1990 Holden Barina is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Barina (67 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 480 kg more than 1990 Holden Barina.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 1990 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | Master RR | Barina |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1322 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2250 mm |
