1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1996 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Passat (74 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 1996 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | Master RR | Passat |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1781 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |