1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 (90 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 35 kg more than 1997 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
| Make | Toyota | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Master RR | 146 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1351 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 90 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
