1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1997 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1997 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volkswagen Golf (100 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 1997 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
| Model | Master RR | Golf |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1595 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
