1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura EL (127 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 131 kg more than 1999 Acura EL.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 1999 Acura EL | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | Master RR | EL |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2619 mm |
