1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2003 Opel Vectra
To start off, 2003 Opel Vectra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Vectra (120 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Vectra should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Vectra weights approximately 260 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2003 Opel Vectra | |
| Make | Toyota | Opel |
| Model | Master RR | Vectra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1794 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1510 mm |
