1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 590 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Master RR | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 4299 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 190 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2720 mm |
