1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser (164 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 705 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Master RR | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 164 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |
