1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (156 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 210 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Master RR | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2201 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 49 L |