1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 546 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Master RR | CTS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
