1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 750 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Master RR | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |
