1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Kia Sportage
To start off, 2010 Kia Sportage is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sportage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Sportage (173 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Sportage should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Sportage weights approximately 310 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Sportage, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Kia Sportage | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | Master RR | Sportage |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2700 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 173 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4351 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1694 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2629 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |
