1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Beetle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Beetle (114 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Beetle should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Beetle weights approximately 1097 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | Master RR | Beetle |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1984 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |