1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ka (68 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 270 kg more than 2011 Ford Ka.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2011 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Master RR | Ka |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1242 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |
