1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2011 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2011 Subaru Forester is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Forester (170 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Subaru Forester weights approximately 264 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2011 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Toyota | Subaru |
Model | Master RR | Forester |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1474 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1674 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2616 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |