1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Master RR | A3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |