1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,143 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (168 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Master RR | C |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2143 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4606 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1459 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 66 L |
