1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Armada (317 HP) has 277 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1259 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Master RR | Armada |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 5600 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 2469 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3129 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |