1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2013 BMW 1 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 1 Series is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW 1 Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 1 Series (296 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 1 Series should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW 1 Series weights approximately 320 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2013 BMW 1 Series | |
| Make | Toyota | BMW |
| Model | Master RR | 1 Series |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2979 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 296 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4373 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1919 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1408 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 53 L |
