1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (296 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 718 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo X670 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Master RR | X670 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1928 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2815 mm |