1960 Triumph Herald vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 718 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Triumph Herald | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Triumph | Honda |
| Model | Herald | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1147 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 58 L |
