1960 Volkswagen Beetle vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. (34 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 604 kg more than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Volkswagen Beetle | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Beetle | S40 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1192 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |