1960 Volkswagen Beetle vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. (34 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 749 kg more than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Volkswagen Beetle | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Chevrolet |
| Model | Beetle | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1192 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1549 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 61 L |
