1960 Volkswagen Beetle vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. (34 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle.
Because 2012 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Volkswagen Beetle | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Beetle | F-350 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1192 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 132 L |