1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1630 kg more than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1000 Bialbero | Brougham |
Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |