1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. (197 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 1000 Bialbero | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 1000 Bialbero | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 988 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 102 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
