1961 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 1300 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 35 L |