1961 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,423 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Citi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1961 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | 1300 | Citi |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 49 L |