1961 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 1300.
Because 1961 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Megane |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |